Direct comparison
Scaleway vs Infomaniak
Scaleway or Infomaniak? The direct cloud comparison of services, data centers, costs and sovereignty. Services, pricing, data centers and sovereignty in a direct comparison.
Management summary
As of 2026-07Scaleway and Infomaniak position themselves as sovereign EU cloud providers with high technological (9/10) and operational sovereignty (9/10), with Infomaniak slightly ahead of Scaleway (7.9/10) with a SEAL Score of 8.2/10 (82%). Scaleway impresses with a broad, cloud-native portfolio featuring strong Bare Metal infrastructure (9/10) and growing AI services (6/10), making it attractive for modern, Linux-based development projects. Infomaniak, on the other hand, scores highly with a Cost Rating of 9.0/10 and an integrated collaboration portfolio (kSuite, 8/10), making it the ideal choice for Swiss organizations focused on data sovereignty and workplace integration. While Scaleway offers more strategic options (6/10) with 80+ services and three European regions, Infomaniak focuses on a lean, open OpenStack IaaS solution in Switzerland with 10+ services. The choice thus depends on the need for broader PaaS and AI infrastructure (Scaleway) versus maximum Swiss sovereignty and integrated office tools (Infomaniak).
Methodology & data basisScaleway
EU providerUSP: European portfolio with a focus on AI infrastructure and cloud-native development
Recommendation: Recommended for companies looking for European Cloud Native alternatives
Infomaniak
EU providerUSP: Independent, employee-owned Swiss provider running a 100% Swiss-hosted OpenStack public cloud with a sovereign Microsoft 365 alternative (kSuite)
Recommendation: Recommended for Switzerland organisations that need data sovereignty,together with an open OpenStack IaaS and basic requirements in infrastructure or an alternative for Collaboration tools
Performance chart
Scaleway and Infomaniak across 8 core categories, compared with the average of all providers (1–10).
Market positioning
All 13 providers by sovereignty and portfolio performance — purely computed from the category ratings.
Positions are purely computational: X = mean of technological & operational sovereignty, Y = mean of all remaining rating categories (each 1–10). Not a ranking recommendation. Methodology & data basis
Strengths & weaknesses
Automatically derived from the editorially reviewed rating data and backed by the category ratings (1–10) — fair to both sides.
Strengths
- Outstanding Bare Metal infrastructure with a score of 9/10 (avg: 5.2), supported by dedicated instances such as Elastic Metal and Dedibox.
- Strong cloud-native and containerization capabilities (8/10, avg: 7.3) with Managed Kubernetes (Kapsule/Kosmos) and serverless options.
- Competitive pricing (Price 9/10, avg: 6.4) with a Cost Rating of 8.5/10 and up to 25% discount via Saving Plans.
- Broad AI and ML portfolio (6/10, avg: 4.8) with Generative APIs and Managed Inference, which is above average for a sovereign provider.
Points to consider
- No global reach (1/10, avg: 4.5), as the provider is present in only 3 countries and 1 continent, limiting international workloads.
- Lack of workplace integration (Collaboration Tools 2/10, avg: 3.7), as no portfolio for office, mail, or conferencing is offered.
- Limited Microsoft support (4/10, avg: 4.5), as Managed MSSQL and AD integration are missing, reducing suitability for Microsoft-heavy environments.
Strengths
- Very high Cost Rating of 9.0/10, making Infomaniak one of the most cost-effective options for typical IaaS usage.
- Integrated collaboration portfolio (8/10, avg: 3.7) via kSuite (kDrive, kMail, kMeet), offering a sovereign alternative to Microsoft 365.
- Highest operational sovereignty in Switzerland with a SEAL Score of 8.2/10 (82%) and 100% Swiss hosting.
- Excellent support for Linux workloads (9/10, avg: 8.8) on an open OpenStack basis.
Points to consider
- Low strategic options (5/10, avg: 6.2) due to a limited portfolio of only 10+ services, largely restricted to IaaS.
- Weak offering for Big Data (3/10, avg: 4.8) and AI/ML (3/10, avg: 4.8), as advanced analytics and AI services are still limited or only announced.
- Few Bare Metal offerings (2/10, avg: 5.2), making deployment for workloads with specific hardware requirements difficult.
Which provider when?
Use-case-based decision aid — both options are a valid choice.
Choose Scaleway if:
- You need a comprehensive cloud-native platform with Managed Kubernetes, serverless containers, and a wide range of managed databases.
- Your workloads require powerful Bare Metal servers or GPU instances for AI/ML training and inference.
- You are looking for a cost-effective EU provider with a strong focus on Linux development and DevOps tools.
- Your company operates primarily in Europe and does not require global presence, but needs a broad PaaS portfolio.
Choose Infomaniak if:
- You are a Swiss organization requiring maximum data sovereignty and compliance with Swiss regulations.
- You are looking for an integrated solution that combines infrastructure (IaaS) and workplace tools (kSuite) from a single provider.
- Your requirements are limited to basic IaaS services (VMs, storage, load balancing) with the highest price competitiveness.
- You prefer an independent, employee-owned provider with an open OpenStack stack and low vendor lock-in.
Service comparison by category
All 19 rating categories in a head-to-head duel (1–10). A notable lead is marked from a 2-point difference.
| Category | ScalewayvsInfomaniakScale 1–10 | Avg. all | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Security & Encryption | 77 | 7.8 | balanced |
| Technological Sovereignty | 99 | 7.4 | balanced |
| Operational Sovereignty | 99 | 8 | balanced |
| Strategic Capabilities | 65 | 6.2 | balanced |
| Price | 98 | 6.4 | balanced |
| Collaboration Tools | 38 | 5.1 | Lead Infomaniak |
| Global Reach | 11 | 4.5 | balanced |
| Big Data | 43 | 4.8 | balanced |
| AI | 63 | 4.8 | Lead Scaleway |
| Bare Metal | 92 | 5.2 | Lead Scaleway |
| Virtualization | 45 | 5.7 | balanced |
| Containerization | 86 | 7.3 | Lead Scaleway |
| Databases | 74 | 6.9 | Lead Scaleway |
| High Availability | 66 | 6.7 | balanced |
| Microsoft | 45 | 4.5 | balanced |
| Linux | 89 | 8.8 | balanced |
| Encryption | 75 | 6.8 | Lead Scaleway |
| Storage | 87 | 7.7 | balanced |
| Network | 86 | 7.8 | Lead Scaleway |
Management Summary
Sovereign Cloud
SEAL Framework
Strategic (15 %)
Legal & Jurisdictional (10 %)
Data & AI (10 %)
Operational (15 %)
Supply Chain (20 %)
Technology (15 %)
Security & Compliance (10 %)
Availability & Locations
Compute
shared & low-budget
Hot Storage
Cold Storage
Managed Databases
Network & Security
Orchestration
Virtualization
Management
Big Data
AI & Machine Learning
Quantum Computing
Compliance & Certificates
Information security management system
Privacy information management extension
Energy management for data centers
Cloud Security Alliance assurance registry
Service organization control audit reports
Payment card data security standard
Quality management system standard
Cost Indication
vCPU/h
H100/h
GB/h
Ratio1/4
GB/h | 3000 IOPS
GB/h
GB/h
Cluster/h
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
per GB
Our comparison methodology
The scores show a relative price comparison per service category. The lowest price earns 10 points; higher prices are marked down proportionally. Missing services are treated neutrally.
As of: List prices as of 11 September 2025, location Germany (DE).
More cloud comparisons
Frequently asked questions: Scaleway vs Infomaniak
What is the difference between Scaleway and Infomaniak?
Scaleway offers a broader, cloud-native portfolio with 80+ services, including strong Bare Metal and AI infrastructure, while Infomaniak focuses on a lean, cost-effective IaaS solution with 10+ services and integrated collaboration tools (kSuite). Scaleway operates in three European countries, Infomaniak exclusively in Switzerland.
Which provider is more sovereign?
Both providers show high scores for technological (9/10) and operational sovereignty (9/10). In the SEAL framework, Infomaniak achieves a slightly higher overall score of 8.2/10 (82%) compared to Scaleway's 7.9/10 (79%), positioning Infomaniak slightly better for strict Swiss sovereignty requirements.
Who is cheaper?
Infomaniak has a higher Cost Rating of 9.0/10 compared to Scaleway's 8.5/10. Both providers offer competitive prices, with Scaleway additionally offering Saving Plans with up to 25% discount. However, actual costs depend heavily on the specific workload and consumption.
Which provider is better for AI and Big Data?
Scaleway is significantly better positioned with an AI score of 6/10 and a Big Data score of 4/10, supported by Generative APIs, Managed Inference, and Data Lab services. Infomaniak scores only 3/10 in both categories, as its portfolio in these areas is still limited.
Does either provider offer collaboration tools?
Yes, Infomaniak offers a comprehensive collaboration portfolio (score 8/10) with kSuite, which includes mail, office, and conferencing. Scaleway has a score of 2/10 in this category and offers no workplace integrations, as it focuses purely on infrastructure.
Not sure which provider fits you?
The Cloud Compass determines the best cloud for your use case — data-driven and vendor-neutral.
Start Cloud Compass