Direct comparison
OVHcloud vs Infomaniak
OVHcloud or Infomaniak? The direct cloud comparison of services, data centers, costs and sovereignty. Services, pricing, data centers and sovereignty in a direct comparison.
Management summary
As of 2026-07OVHcloud and Infomaniak both represent the European, sovereign cloud market, but differ significantly in portfolio breadth and geographic focus. OVHcloud offers a scalable platform with a strong bare metal and storage infrastructure, covering global presence beyond Europe, backed by a SEAL Score of 8.6/10 and a broad service portfolio (100+ services). Infomaniak positions itself as an independent, employee-owned Swiss provider with a SEAL Score of 8.2/10, focusing on maximum data sovereignty within Switzerland and a strong collaboration portfolio (kSuite). While OVHcloud excels in technological depth in containerization and big data, Infomaniak convinces with a simple IaaS structure and high price competitiveness in the Swiss region. The choice depends on whether global scalability and PaaS depth (OVHcloud) or strict Swiss residency and workplace integration (Infomaniak) are in the foreground.
Methodology & data basisOVHcloud
EU providerUSP: Leading European Cloud, Possibility to combine Private Cloud with Bare Metal and Public Cloud
Recommendation: Recommended for cost-conscious companies that require global scalability and strong EU data protection
Infomaniak
EU providerUSP: Independent, employee-owned Swiss provider running a 100% Swiss-hosted OpenStack public cloud with a sovereign Microsoft 365 alternative (kSuite)
Recommendation: Recommended for Switzerland organisations that need data sovereignty,together with an open OpenStack IaaS and basic requirements in infrastructure or an alternative for Collaboration tools
Performance chart
OVHcloud and Infomaniak across 8 core categories, compared with the average of all providers (1–10).
Market positioning
All 13 providers by sovereignty and portfolio performance — purely computed from the category ratings.
Positions are purely computational: X = mean of technological & operational sovereignty, Y = mean of all remaining rating categories (each 1–10). Not a ranking recommendation. Methodology & data basis
Strengths & weaknesses
Automatically derived from the editorially reviewed rating data and backed by the category ratings (1–10) — fair to both sides.
Strengths
- OVHcloud offers the most mature bare metal offering with a score of 10/10 (average of all providers: 5.2/10), which optimally supports dedicated hardware loads.
- The storage portfolio is very comprehensive with 10/10 (average of all providers: 7.7/10), including block, object, file, and archive tiers.
- With a SEAL Score of 8.6/10 and scores of 9/10 in technological and operational sovereignty (average: 7.4/10 and 8/10 respectively), OVHcloud offers high independence.
- Containerization reaches 9/10 (average of all providers: 7.3/10), indicating a mature managed Kubernetes platform.
Points to consider
- Microsoft integration is below average with 4/10 (average of all providers: 4.5/10), making Windows server or AD-heavy environments more difficult.
- Strategic opportunities are at 6/10 (average of all providers: 6.2/10); important services such as serverless or certain firewall components are not yet productive ('announced').
- Global reach outside Europe is present with 6/10 (average of all providers: 4.5/10), but limited compared to global hyperscalers.
Strengths
- Infomaniak achieves the highest cost rating with 9.0/10 (OVHcloud: 8.0/10), indicating very competitive prices for typical IaaS usage.
- With a score of 9/10 in Linux suitability (average of all providers: 8.8/10), the platform is excellently optimized for Linux-based workloads.
- The collaboration portfolio (kSuite) reaches 8/10 (average of all providers: 3.7/10), offering a strong alternative to proprietary office suites.
- Infomaniak shows high operational sovereignty of 9/10 (average of all providers: 8/10), supported by the 100% Swiss hosting structure.
Points to consider
- The bare metal offering is very limited with 2/10 (average of all providers: 5.2/10), barely meeting dedicated hardware requirements.
- Strategic opportunities are below average with 5/10 (average of all providers: 6.2/10), as the portfolio is strongly limited to IaaS.
- Big Data (3/10, average: 4.8/10) and AI services (3/10, average: 4.8/10) are significantly less pronounced than with the comparison partner.
Which provider when?
Use-case-based decision aid — both options are a valid choice.
Choose OVHcloud if:
- You need a broad portfolio of managed services, especially for big data, containerization, and various database types.
- Your workloads require dedicated bare metal servers or an extensive, multi-tier storage portfolio (hot/cold/archive).
- You are looking for a platform with global presence beyond Europe that still meets high European sovereignty standards (SEAL 8.6/10).
- You plan a migration from VMware environments, as OVHcloud is better positioned here with 8/10 (virtualization) than Infomaniak (5/10).
Choose Infomaniak if:
- You need strict data sovereignty with 100% hosting in Switzerland and prefer an independent, employee-owned provider.
- Your focus is on Linux-based IaaS workloads with high price awareness (cost rating 9.0/10).
- You are looking for an integrated solution that combines infrastructure with collaboration tools (kSuite, score 8/10).
- You do not need complex PaaS services such as big data or AI, but rather a simple, transparent OpenStack-based cloud.
Service comparison by category
All 19 rating categories in a head-to-head duel (1–10). A notable lead is marked from a 2-point difference.
| Category | OVHcloudvsInfomaniakScale 1–10 | Avg. all | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Security & Encryption | 77 | 7.8 | balanced |
| Technological Sovereignty | 99 | 7.4 | balanced |
| Operational Sovereignty | 99 | 8 | balanced |
| Strategic Capabilities | 65 | 6.2 | balanced |
| Price | 88 | 6.4 | balanced |
| Collaboration Tools | 68 | 5.1 | Lead Infomaniak |
| Global Reach | 61 | 4.5 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Big Data | 63 | 4.8 | Lead OVHcloud |
| AI | 53 | 4.8 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Bare Metal | 102 | 5.2 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Virtualization | 85 | 5.7 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Containerization | 96 | 7.3 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Databases | 74 | 6.9 | Lead OVHcloud |
| High Availability | 86 | 6.7 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Microsoft | 45 | 4.5 | balanced |
| Linux | 89 | 8.8 | balanced |
| Encryption | 75 | 6.8 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Storage | 107 | 7.7 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Network | 96 | 7.8 | Lead OVHcloud |
Management Summary
Sovereign Cloud
SEAL Framework
Strategic (15 %)
Legal & Jurisdictional (10 %)
Data & AI (10 %)
Operational (15 %)
Supply Chain (20 %)
Technology (15 %)
Security & Compliance (10 %)
Availability & Locations
Compute
shared & low-budget
Hot Storage
Cold Storage
Managed Databases
Network & Security
Orchestration
Virtualization
Management
Big Data
AI & Machine Learning
Compliance & Certificates
German cloud security catalogue
Information security management system
Cloud security controls for providers
Personal data protection for cloud
Privacy information management extension
Energy management for data centers
Cloud Security Alliance assurance registry
Service organization control audit reports
Payment card data security standard
Cost Indication
vCPU/h
H100/h
GB/h
CPU/h
Ratio1/4
GB/h | 3000 IOPS
GB/h
GB/h
GB/h
Cluster/h
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
per GB
Our comparison methodology
The scores show a relative price comparison per service category. The lowest price earns 10 points; higher prices are marked down proportionally. Missing services are treated neutrally.
As of: List prices as of 11 September 2025, location Germany (DE).
More cloud comparisons
Frequently asked questions: OVHcloud vs Infomaniak
What is the difference between OVHcloud and Infomaniak?
OVHcloud offers a broader portfolio with over 100 services, a strong focus on bare metal (10/10) and global reach, while Infomaniak focuses on Swiss sovereignty, a strong collaboration portfolio (kSuite, 8/10) and high price competitiveness (cost rating 9.0/10). OVHcloud is technologically deeper in PaaS areas such as big data and AI, Infomaniak is simpler and specialized in IaaS/workplace.
Which provider is more sovereign?
Both providers show high sovereignty values. OVHcloud has a SEAL Score of 8.6/10, Infomaniak 8.2/10. In the categories of technological and operational sovereignty, both reach 9/10. The difference lies in the geographic orientation: OVHcloud is EU-centric with global outreach, Infomaniak is strictly focused on Switzerland (1 country, 2 data centers).
Who is cheaper?
Infomaniak has a higher cost rating of 9.0/10 compared to OVHcloud with 8.0/10. This indicates better price competitiveness for typical IaaS/PaaS consumption. However, actual costs are highly workload-dependent and should be calculated based on specific service usage.
Which provider is better for Microsoft workloads?
Infomaniak is slightly better positioned here with a score of 5/10 compared to OVHcloud with 4/10 (average of all providers: 4.5/10). However, neither provider is primarily specialized in Microsoft integration, which can be a limitation for complex AD or Hyper-V migrations.
How do the providers stand in AI and big data?
OVHcloud is significantly better positioned with scores of 5/10 for AI and 6/10 for big data. Infomaniak only reaches 3/10 in both categories. OVHcloud offers productive services such as AI Endpoints and Kafka, while Infomaniak holds only limited or no productive managed services in these areas.
Not sure which provider fits you?
The Cloud Compass determines the best cloud for your use case — data-driven and vendor-neutral.
Start Cloud Compass