Direct comparison
Scaleway vs T Cloud Public
Scaleway or T Cloud Public? The direct cloud comparison of services, data centers, costs and sovereignty. Services, pricing, data centers and sovereignty in a direct comparison.
Management summary
As of 2026-07Scaleway and T Cloud Public are both EU providers with a strong focus on sovereignty and data protection. Scaleway stands out with outstanding pricing, particularly for GPU and Egress, as well as robust Bare Metal and container infrastructure. Operational and technological sovereignty are at top level for Scaleway, supported by a SEAL Score of 7.9/10. T Cloud Public impresses with maximum operational sovereignty (10/10) and a broad service portfolio that goes beyond pure IaaS. However, both providers are limited to European markets and do not offer global reach. Scaleway is particularly suitable for companies seeking a cost-effective, sovereign EU cloud with a strong cloud-native foundation, while T Cloud Public is ideal for companies in DACH and the Netherlands requiring high availability and strong data sovereignty.
Methodology & data basisScaleway
EU providerUSP: European portfolio with a focus on AI infrastructure and cloud-native development
Recommendation: Recommended for companies looking for European Cloud Native alternatives
T Cloud Public
EU providerUSP: German cloud provider with an independent, broad public cloud portfolio combining shared and dedicated resources, including first serverless capabilities.
Recommendation: Recommended for companies in DACH and the Netherlands that operate regionally but require high availability and strong data sovereignty.
Performance chart
Scaleway and T Cloud Public across 8 core categories, compared with the average of all providers (1–10).
Market positioning
All 13 providers by sovereignty and portfolio performance — purely computed from the category ratings.
Positions are purely computational: X = mean of technological & operational sovereignty, Y = mean of all remaining rating categories (each 1–10). Not a ranking recommendation. Methodology & data basis
Strengths & weaknesses
Automatically derived from the editorially reviewed rating data and backed by the category ratings (1–10) — fair to both sides.
Strengths
- Outstanding pricing with a Cost Rating of 8.5/10 and up to 25% discount via Saving Plans, particularly for GPU (9.0/10) and Egress (10.0/10).
- Maximum sovereignty in the European region with technological (9/10) and operational sovereignty (9/10), supported by a SEAL Score of 7.9/10 and EU residency.
- Strong Bare Metal and container infrastructure with a Bare Metal Score of 9/10 and mature containerization (8/10) with Managed Kubernetes.
- Solid foundation for Linux and storage with Linux support of 8/10 and a storage portfolio of 8/10 covering Block, File, Object, and Archive.
Points to consider
- No global reach with only 3 countries and 1 continent, making the provider unsuitable for international workloads.
- Lack of workplace integration with a Collaboration Tools Score of 2/10, underscoring its use as a pure infrastructure offering.
- Weak enterprise virtualization with a Virtualization Score of 4/10, complicating the migration of classic enterprise estates.
Strengths
- Maximum operational sovereignty (10/10) with fully EU-based operations, support, and personnel, ensuring independence from non-EU interventions.
- High technological sovereignty (9/10) with an open stack and standards that ensure low lock-in and high exit-friendliness.
- Broad service portfolio with 80+ services that goes beyond pure IaaS, including Managed Databases, Kubernetes, and Storage.
- Attractive pricing options for specific workloads with a high price rating for RAM (8.6/10) and Block Storage (8.2/10), as well as Saving Plans with up to 48% savings.
Points to consider
- Weak AI and Big Data offering with scores of 2/10 each, significantly below the average of other providers.
- No global reach with a score of 2/10 and presence exclusively in Europe, which is an exclusion criterion for international customers.
- Lack of enterprise virtualization paths with a Virtualization Score of 1/10, which does not directly support classic virtualization environments.
Which provider when?
Use-case-based decision aid — both options are a valid choice.
Choose Scaleway if:
- You are looking for a cost-effective, sovereign EU cloud with a strong cloud-native foundation.
- Your workloads are limited to European markets and do not require global reach.
- You need strong Bare Metal and container infrastructure.
- Your environment is heavily oriented towards Linux and storage solutions.
Choose T Cloud Public if:
- You require maximum operational sovereignty and high availability in DACH and the Netherlands.
- Your company relies heavily on EU-based operations and data sovereignty.
- You need a broad service portfolio that goes beyond pure IaaS.
- Your workloads require attractive pricing options for specific resources such as RAM and Block Storage.
Service comparison by category
All 19 rating categories in a head-to-head duel (1–10). A notable lead is marked from a 2-point difference.
| Category | ScalewayvsT Cloud PublicScale 1–10 | Avg. all | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Security & Encryption | 77 | 7.8 | balanced |
| Technological Sovereignty | 99 | 7.4 | balanced |
| Operational Sovereignty | 910 | 8 | balanced |
| Strategic Capabilities | 65 | 6.2 | balanced |
| Price | 95 | 6.4 | Lead Scaleway |
| Collaboration Tools | 36 | 5.1 | Lead T Cloud Public |
| Global Reach | 12 | 4.5 | balanced |
| Big Data | 42 | 4.8 | Lead Scaleway |
| AI | 62 | 4.8 | Lead Scaleway |
| Bare Metal | 91 | 5.2 | Lead Scaleway |
| Virtualization | 41 | 5.7 | Lead Scaleway |
| Containerization | 87 | 7.3 | balanced |
| Databases | 76 | 6.9 | balanced |
| High Availability | 65 | 6.7 | balanced |
| Microsoft | 44 | 4.5 | balanced |
| Linux | 87 | 8.8 | balanced |
| Encryption | 77 | 6.8 | balanced |
| Storage | 87 | 7.7 | balanced |
| Network | 85 | 7.8 | Lead Scaleway |
Management Summary
Sovereign Cloud
SEAL Framework
Strategic (15 %)
Legal & Jurisdictional (10 %)
Data & AI (10 %)
Operational (15 %)
Supply Chain (20 %)
Technology (15 %)
Security & Compliance (10 %)
Environmental (5 %)
Availability & Locations
Compute
shared & low-budget
Hot Storage
Cold Storage
Managed Databases
Network & Security
Orchestration
Virtualization
Management
Big Data
AI & Machine Learning
Quantum Computing
Compliance & Certificates
German cloud security catalogue
IT service management system standard
Information security management system
Cloud security controls for providers
Personal data protection for cloud
Privacy information management extension
Energy management for data centers
Cloud Security Alliance assurance registry
Service organization control audit reports
Payment card data security standard
Quality management system standard
Cost Indication
vCPU/h
H100/h
GB/h
Ratio1/4
GB/h | 3000 IOPS
GB/h
GB/h
GB/h
Cluster/h
per 1 Mil Requests
GB-Sec
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
per GB
Our comparison methodology
The scores show a relative price comparison per service category. The lowest price earns 10 points; higher prices are marked down proportionally. Missing services are treated neutrally.
As of: List prices as of 11 September 2025, location Germany (DE).
More cloud comparisons
Frequently asked questions: Scaleway vs T Cloud Public
What is the difference between Scaleway and T Cloud Public?
Scaleway stands out with outstanding pricing, strong Bare Metal and container infrastructure, and maximum sovereignty in the European region. T Cloud Public impresses with maximum operational sovereignty and a broad service portfolio that goes beyond pure IaaS. However, both providers are limited to European markets and do not offer global reach.
Which provider is more sovereign?
Scaleway has a SEAL Score of 7.9/10, while T Cloud Public has a SEAL Score of 7.6/10. Both providers offer maximum operational sovereignty, with Scaleway slightly ahead.
Which provider is cheaper?
Scaleway has a Cost Rating of 8.5/10, while T Cloud Public has a Cost Rating of 5.8/10. Scaleway is overall cheaper, particularly for GPU and Egress. However, actual costs depend on the workload.
Which provider offers better AI and Big Data offerings?
Scaleway has an AI Score of 6/10 and a Big Data Score of 4/10, while T Cloud Public has 2/10 for each. Scaleway offers a stronger AI and Big Data portfolio.
Which provider is better suited for enterprise virtualization?
Scaleway has a Virtualization Score of 4/10, while T Cloud Public has a score of 1/10. Scaleway offers better support for enterprise virtualization, although it remains limited.
Not sure which provider fits you?
The Cloud Compass determines the best cloud for your use case — data-driven and vendor-neutral.
Start Cloud Compass