Direct comparison
OVHcloud or Hetzner? The direct cloud comparison of services, data centers, costs and sovereignty. Services, pricing, data centers and sovereignty in a direct comparison.
OVHcloud and Hetzner are both independent EU providers characterized by high operational sovereignty (9/10 each) and strong Bare Metal offerings (10/10 each), but they differ fundamentally in platform maturity. OVHcloud offers a comprehensive cloud platform suitable for complex, modern architectures with a SEAL Score of 8.6/10 and a broad portfolio of Managed Services such as Kubernetes (9/10) and databases (7/10). Hetzner focuses as a pure IaaS provider on maximum cost efficiency (Cost Rating 9.6/10) and simple compute infrastructure, largely dispensing with Managed Services such as databases (0/10) or container orchestration (1/10). While OVHcloud scores with a global network (6/10) and advanced security features, Hetzner, with a SEAL Score of 7.4/10 and a limited location network (3/10), is primarily designed for cost-sensitive, Europe-centric Linux workloads without claims to PaaS features.
Methodology & data basisUSP: Leading European Cloud, Possibility to combine Private Cloud with Bare Metal and Public Cloud
Recommendation: Recommended for cost-conscious companies that require global scalability and strong EU data protection
USP: Very strong price-performance IaaS from a German independent Provider on EU-operated data centers, focussing on compute power
Recommendation: Recommended for cost-sensitive DACH teams that want a modern data center with basic requirements on bare metal inrastructure
OVHcloud and Hetzner across 8 core categories, compared with the average of all providers (1–10).
All 13 providers by sovereignty and portfolio performance — purely computed from the category ratings.
Positions are purely computational: X = mean of technological & operational sovereignty, Y = mean of all remaining rating categories (each 1–10). Not a ranking recommendation. Methodology & data basis
Automatically derived from the editorially reviewed rating data and backed by the category ratings (1–10) — fair to both sides.
Use-case-based decision aid — both options are a valid choice.
All 19 rating categories in a head-to-head duel (1–10). A notable lead is marked from a 2-point difference.
| Category | OVHcloudvsHetznerScale 1–10 | Avg. all | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Security & Encryption | 74 | 7.8 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Technological Sovereignty | 98 | 7.4 | balanced |
| Operational Sovereignty | 99 | 8 | balanced |
| Strategic Capabilities | 63 | 6.2 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Price | 89 | 6.4 | balanced |
| Collaboration Tools | 63 | 5.1 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Global Reach | 63 | 4.5 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Big Data | 60 | 4.8 | Lead OVHcloud |
| AI | 50 | 4.8 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Bare Metal | 1010 | 5.2 | balanced |
| Virtualization | 80 | 5.7 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Containerization | 91 | 7.3 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Databases | 70 | 6.9 | Lead OVHcloud |
| High Availability | 84 | 6.7 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Microsoft | 41 | 4.5 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Linux | 89 | 8.8 | balanced |
| Encryption | 72 | 6.8 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Storage | 106 | 7.7 | Lead OVHcloud |
| Network | 95 | 7.8 | Lead OVHcloud |
Strategic (15 %)
Legal & Jurisdictional (10 %)
Data & AI (10 %)
Operational (15 %)
Supply Chain (20 %)
Technology (15 %)
Security & Compliance (10 %)
Environmental (5 %)
shared & low-budget
vCPU/h
H100/h
GB/h
CPU/h
Ratio1/4
GB/h | 3000 IOPS
GB/h
GB/h
GB/h
Cluster/h
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
per GB
The scores show a relative price comparison per service category. The lowest price earns 10 points; higher prices are marked down proportionally. Missing services are treated neutrally.
As of: List prices as of 11 September 2025, location Germany (DE).
OVHcloud offers a comprehensive cloud platform with Managed Services such as Kubernetes (9/10), databases (7/10), and Big Data tools, while Hetzner focuses as a pure IaaS provider on cost-efficient compute and storage infrastructure. Hetzner has no Managed Kubernetes (1/10) and no Managed Databases (0/10), requiring manual operation of complex applications. OVHcloud also scores higher with a SEAL Score (8.6/10 vs. 7.4/10) and a broader global network.
Both providers achieve a high operational sovereignty score of 9/10. Technologically, OVHcloud is slightly more sovereign with 9/10 (avg. 7.4) compared to Hetzner with 8/10, supported by a higher SEAL Score of 8.6/10 versus 7.4/10 for Hetzner. Both are independent EU providers, but OVHcloud offers more certifications and a more open stack for low lock-in migrations.
Hetzner is significantly cheaper with a Cost Rating of 9.6/10 (avg. 6.4), particularly for CPU (9.8/10) and S3 Storage (9.6/10). OVHcloud is also above average with 8.0/10 but is more expensive than Hetzner. Actual costs, however, are highly workload-dependent; OVHcloud offers Savings Plans of up to 54%, while Hetzner does not list such plans.
OVHcloud is significantly better suited for Kubernetes with a score of 9/10 (avg. 7.3) and a productive Managed Kubernetes Service. Hetzner achieves only 1/10 in containerization and offers no Managed Kubernetes Service, meaning clusters must be operated manually.
Yes, OVHcloud offers significantly higher data security and encryption with 7/10 (avg. 7.8) compared to Hetzner with 4/10. OVHcloud offers productive KMS and Secret Manager solutions (Encryption 7/10), while Hetzner achieves only 2/10 here and lists no managed encryption services.
The Cloud Compass determines the best cloud for your use case — data-driven and vendor-neutral.
Start Cloud Compass