Direct comparison
STACKIT vs Infomaniak
STACKIT or Infomaniak? The direct cloud comparison of services, data centers, costs and sovereignty. Services, pricing, data centers and sovereignty in a direct comparison.
Management summary
As of 2026-07STACKIT and Infomaniak position themselves as sovereign EU cloud providers with an identical SEAL Score of 8.2/10 (82%), but differ significantly in their strategic orientation and target audience. STACKIT focuses as a German infrastructure cloud on maximum operational control (10/10) and data security (9/10), offers a broad Managed Database portfolio (8/10), and is ideal for complex Linux workloads (10/10) in the DACH region, but deliberately forgoes collaboration tools and global reach. Infomaniak impresses as an independent Swiss provider with very competitive prices (8/10) and an integrated collaboration portfolio with kSuite (8/10), making it an attractive all-in-one solution for organizations that need infrastructure and workplace services from a single source. While STACKIT excels with its deep PaaS offering for databases and encryption, Infomaniak's strength lies in cost efficiency and the combination of OpenStack IaaS and productive AI services, with both providers showing comparable limitations in strategic opportunities (5/10) and global reach (1/10).
Methodology & data basisSTACKIT
EU providerUSP: German cloud with maximum compliance and a clear focus on IaaS and PaaS
Recommendation: Recommended for organizations prioritizing local security and trust
Infomaniak
EU providerUSP: Independent, employee-owned Swiss provider running a 100% Swiss-hosted OpenStack public cloud with a sovereign Microsoft 365 alternative (kSuite)
Recommendation: Recommended for Switzerland organisations that need data sovereignty,together with an open OpenStack IaaS and basic requirements in infrastructure or an alternative for Collaboration tools
Performance chart
STACKIT and Infomaniak across 8 core categories, compared with the average of all providers (1–10).
Market positioning
All 13 providers by sovereignty and portfolio performance — purely computed from the category ratings.
Positions are purely computational: X = mean of technological & operational sovereignty, Y = mean of all remaining rating categories (each 1–10). Not a ranking recommendation. Methodology & data basis
Strengths & weaknesses
Automatically derived from the editorially reviewed rating data and backed by the category ratings (1–10) — fair to both sides.
Strengths
- Maximum operational sovereignty (10/10): STACKIT achieves the highest score in the comparison field for operational control from Europe, supported by a SEAL Score of 8.2/10 (82%) and SEAL 3 certification.
- Strong data security and encryption (9/10): With a score of 9/10 (avg. all providers: 7.8), the platform offers technical protection mechanisms such as Confidential Cloud by Edgeless Systems, Confidential Server, and a Secrets Manager (Encryption 8/10).
- Excellent Linux support (10/10): With the highest score in the comparison field (10/10, avg. all providers: 8.8), STACKIT is an optimal target platform for Linux workloads and open-source ecosystems.
- Solid Managed Database portfolio (8/10): The offering of true DBaaS services (8/10, avg. all providers: 6.9) includes PostgreSQL Flex, MariaDB, SQLServer Flex, MongoDB Flex, Redis, and OpenSearch.
Points to consider
- No global reach (1/10): With only 2 regions in 2 countries (Germany and Austria) and 3 availability zones, the provider is unsuitable for workloads outside Europe (avg. all providers: 4.5).
- Weak AI and Big Data offering (3/10): The AI and Big Data categories are each at 3/10 (avg. all providers: 4.8); many AI services are only 'announced' and Dremio is in beta.
- No collaboration tools (1/10): There is no portfolio for workplace services such as mail, office, or conferencing (avg. all providers: 3.7), confirming its use as a pure infrastructure cloud.
Strengths
- Very competitive prices (8/10): Infomaniak achieves a price score of 8/10 (avg. all providers: 6.4), making it attractive for cost-sensitive IaaS/PaaS projects, underpinned by a Cost Rating of 9.0/10.
- Comprehensive collaboration portfolio (8/10): With a score of 8/10 (avg. all providers: 3.7), Infomaniak offers kSuite (kDrive, kMail, kMeet, kChat) as a productive alternative to established workplace solutions.
- High technological sovereignty (9/10): The open stack and low lock-in risk result in a score of 9/10 (avg. all providers: 7.4), underscoring exit-friendliness and independence from proprietary technology.
- Strong operational sovereignty (9/10): With a score of 9/10 (avg. all providers: 8.0), Infomaniak guarantees EU-based management and personnel structure, supported by the SEAL Score of 8.2/10 (82%).
Points to consider
- Limited Managed Database portfolio (4/10): With a score of 4/10 (avg. all providers: 6.9), the offering of true DBaaS services is limited; only MySQL is productively available, while PostgreSQL, Redis, and OpenSearch are listed as 'announced'.
- Weak offering for Big Data and AI (3/10): Both categories are at 3/10 (avg. all providers: 4.8), indicating a limited offering for advanced analytics and ML workloads.
- No global reach (1/10): With only 1 region in 1 country (Switzerland) and 2 availability zones, the provider is unsuitable for international customer structures (avg. all providers: 4.5).
Which provider when?
Use-case-based decision aid — both options are a valid choice.
Choose STACKIT if:
- You require maximum operational control and data security for sensitive workloads in the DACH region, supported by certifications such as BSI C5 and SEAL 3.
- Your architecture is heavily based on Linux and requires a broad, productive portfolio of managed databases (including MongoDB, Redis, OpenSearch) without your own operational effort.
- You prefer a cloud with free egress costs (10/10) and competitive prices for Kubernetes Premium (8.7/10), even if the overall cost structure is more variable.
- You require specific security features such as Confidential Computing and a dedicated Secrets Manager for the highest compliance requirements.
Choose Infomaniak if:
- You are looking for a cost-efficient solution (Cost Rating 9.0/10) for standard IaaS workloads with transparent pricing for CPU, RAM, and storage.
- You need an integrated solution that provides infrastructure (OpenStack) and workplace services (kSuite) from a single source to avoid vendor lock-in with collaboration tools.
- Your focus is on Switzerland as a data residency with an independent, employee-led provider that guarantees high technological sovereignty (9/10).
- You require productive AI services (Assistant, Audio Analysis, Image Generation) and a solid Linux environment (9/10), but forgo complex Big Data platforms.
Service comparison by category
All 19 rating categories in a head-to-head duel (1–10). A notable lead is marked from a 2-point difference.
| Category | STACKITvsInfomaniakScale 1–10 | Avg. all | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Security & Encryption | 97 | 7.8 | Lead STACKIT |
| Technological Sovereignty | 99 | 7.4 | balanced |
| Operational Sovereignty | 109 | 8 | balanced |
| Strategic Capabilities | 55 | 6.2 | balanced |
| Price | 58 | 6.4 | Lead Infomaniak |
| Collaboration Tools | 58 | 5.1 | Lead Infomaniak |
| Global Reach | 11 | 4.5 | balanced |
| Big Data | 33 | 4.8 | balanced |
| AI | 33 | 4.8 | balanced |
| Bare Metal | 12 | 5.2 | balanced |
| Virtualization | 65 | 5.7 | balanced |
| Containerization | 66 | 7.3 | balanced |
| Databases | 84 | 6.9 | Lead STACKIT |
| High Availability | 66 | 6.7 | balanced |
| Microsoft | 45 | 4.5 | balanced |
| Linux | 109 | 8.8 | balanced |
| Encryption | 85 | 6.8 | Lead STACKIT |
| Storage | 77 | 7.7 | balanced |
| Network | 86 | 7.8 | Lead STACKIT |
Management Summary
Sovereign Cloud
SEAL Framework
Strategic (15 %)
Legal & Jurisdictional (10 %)
Data & AI (10 %)
Operational (15 %)
Supply Chain (20 %)
Technology (15 %)
Security & Compliance (10 %)
Environmental (5 %)
Availability & Locations
Compute
shared & low-budget
Hot Storage
Cold Storage
Managed Databases
Network & Security
Orchestration
Virtualization
Management
Big Data
AI & Machine Learning
Quantum Computing
Compliance & Certificates
German cloud security catalogue
IT service management system standard
Information security management system
Energy management for data centers
Cloud Security Alliance assurance registry
Service organization control audit reports
Quality management system standard
Cost Indication
vCPU/h
H100/h
GB/h
Ratio1/4
GB/h | 3000 IOPS
GB/h
GB/h
Cluster/h
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
per GB
Our comparison methodology
The scores show a relative price comparison per service category. The lowest price earns 10 points; higher prices are marked down proportionally. Missing services are treated neutrally.
As of: List prices as of 11 September 2025, location Germany (DE).
More cloud comparisons
Frequently asked questions: STACKIT vs Infomaniak
What is the difference between STACKIT and Infomaniak?
STACKIT is a German infrastructure cloud with a focus on maximum operational sovereignty (10/10), data security (9/10), and a broad Managed Database portfolio (8/10), but forgoes collaboration tools. Infomaniak is a Swiss provider that excels with very competitive prices (8/10) and an integrated collaboration portfolio with kSuite (8/10), while the database offering (4/10) and global reach (1/10) are more limited. Both providers share a SEAL Score of 8.2/10 (82%) and high technological sovereignty.
Which provider is more sovereign?
Both providers achieve an identical SEAL Score of 8.2/10 (82%) and are classified as EU providers. However, STACKIT impresses with maximum operational sovereignty (10/10) and stronger technical security mechanisms (9/10), while Infomaniak excels with its independence as an employee-led Swiss company and high technological sovereignty (9/10). The choice depends on whether operational control (STACKIT) or structural independence and price stability (Infomaniak) are prioritized.
Who is cheaper?
Infomaniak achieves a significantly better price rating (8/10) and a Cost Rating of 9.0/10 compared to STACKIT (Price 5/10, Cost Rating 5.4/10). This makes Infomaniak often more cost-efficient for typical IaaS/PaaS consumption. However, STACKIT offers free egress costs (10/10) and competitive prices for specific resources such as Kubernetes Premium (8.7/10). Actual costs are highly workload-dependent and should be calculated based on individual usage.
Which provider offers better managed databases?
STACKIT offers a significantly broader and more productive Managed Database portfolio with a score of 8/10 (avg. all providers: 6.9). This includes PostgreSQL Flex, MariaDB, SQLServer Flex, MongoDB Flex, Redis, and OpenSearch. Infomaniak lags behind here with 4/10; only MySQL is productively available, while PostgreSQL, Redis, and OpenSearch are listed as 'announced' and thus not yet generally available.
Do both providers offer collaboration tools?
No, only Infomaniak offers a productive collaboration portfolio with a score of 8/10 (avg. all providers: 3.7). This includes kSuite (kDrive, kMail, kMeet, kChat) and kSuite Pro. STACKIT has a score of 1/10 in this category and offers no workplace services, making it a pure infrastructure cloud.
Not sure which provider fits you?
The Cloud Compass determines the best cloud for your use case — data-driven and vendor-neutral.
Start Cloud Compass