Direct comparison
IONOS Cloud or Infomaniak? The direct cloud comparison of services, data centers, costs and sovereignty. Services, pricing, data centers and sovereignty in a direct comparison.
IONOS Cloud and Infomaniak position themselves as sovereign EU providers with a strong focus on technological independence and price competitiveness, but differ significantly in portfolio breadth and target audience. IONOS Cloud offers a robust infrastructure for European companies that do not require collaboration tools, with a score of 10/10 in operational sovereignty and a broad IaaS/PaaS portfolio that includes Bare Metal (8/10) and containerization (8/10). Infomaniak stands out as an employee-owned Swiss provider with a very high Cost Rating of 9.0/10 and an integrated collaboration portfolio (kSuite, 8/10), making it ideal for organizations seeking infrastructure and workplace services from a single source. While IONOS convinces with certifications such as C5 and a broader database offering (7/10), Infomaniak's portfolio is focused on Linux workloads (9/10) and OpenStack, with advanced PaaS services such as Big Data or AI still being limited (3/10 each). The choice thus depends on whether the focus is on a broad, certified infrastructure (IONOS) or on an integrated, cost-effective solution with collaboration tools (Infomaniak).
Methodology & data basisUSP: German cloud with independent radio of CPU and RAM in public Cloud, Broad offering of shared and dedicated instances.
Recommendation: Recommended for cost-conscious companies that focus on the EU market and require a mix of shared and dedicated hardware.
USP: Independent, employee-owned Swiss provider running a 100% Swiss-hosted OpenStack public cloud with a sovereign Microsoft 365 alternative (kSuite)
Recommendation: Recommended for Switzerland organisations that need data sovereignty,together with an open OpenStack IaaS and basic requirements in infrastructure or an alternative for Collaboration tools
IONOS Cloud and Infomaniak across 8 core categories, compared with the average of all providers (1–10).
All 13 providers by sovereignty and portfolio performance — purely computed from the category ratings.
Positions are purely computational: X = mean of technological & operational sovereignty, Y = mean of all remaining rating categories (each 1–10). Not a ranking recommendation. Methodology & data basis
Automatically derived from the editorially reviewed rating data and backed by the category ratings (1–10) — fair to both sides.
Use-case-based decision aid — both options are a valid choice.
All 19 rating categories in a head-to-head duel (1–10). A notable lead is marked from a 2-point difference.
| Category | IONOS CloudvsInfomaniakScale 1–10 | Avg. all | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Security & Encryption | 77 | 7.8 | balanced |
| Technological Sovereignty | 99 | 7.4 | balanced |
| Operational Sovereignty | 109 | 8 | balanced |
| Strategic Capabilities | 65 | 6.2 | balanced |
| Price | 88 | 6.4 | balanced |
| Collaboration Tools | 78 | 5.1 | balanced |
| Global Reach | 41 | 4.5 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Big Data | 33 | 4.8 | balanced |
| AI | 33 | 4.8 | balanced |
| Bare Metal | 82 | 5.2 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Virtualization | 65 | 5.7 | balanced |
| Containerization | 86 | 7.3 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Databases | 74 | 6.9 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| High Availability | 56 | 6.7 | balanced |
| Microsoft | 45 | 4.5 | balanced |
| Linux | 89 | 8.8 | balanced |
| Encryption | 75 | 6.8 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Storage | 87 | 7.7 | balanced |
| Network | 76 | 7.8 | balanced |
Strategic (15 %)
Legal & Jurisdictional (10 %)
Data & AI (10 %)
Operational (15 %)
Supply Chain (20 %)
Technology (15 %)
Security & Compliance (10 %)
Environmental (5 %)
shared & low-budget
Service organization control audit reports
vCPU/h
H100/h
GB/h
CPU/h
Ratio1/4
GB/h | 3000 IOPS
GB/h
Cluster/h
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
per GB
The scores show a relative price comparison per service category. The lowest price earns 10 points; higher prices are marked down proportionally. Missing services are treated neutrally.
As of: List prices as of 11 September 2025, location Germany (DE).
IONOS Cloud offers a broader IaaS/PaaS portfolio with a focus on Bare Metal (8/10), containerization (8/10), and comprehensive compliance (C5, PCI DSS), but lacks collaboration tools (1/10). Infomaniak is a Swiss provider with a strong focus on price (Cost Rating 9.0/10) and integrated collaboration tools (kSuite, 8/10), but offers less PaaS depth and no Bare Metal options (2/10).
Both providers are highly sovereign. IONOS Cloud achieves the maximum score in operational sovereignty (10/10) and a SEAL score of 8.0/10. Infomaniak has a slightly higher SEAL score of 8.2/10 and an operational sovereignty of 9/10. Both offer technological sovereignty with 9/10. The choice depends on whether maximum operational control (IONOS) or the specific Swiss legal space (Infomaniak) is prioritized.
Infomaniak has a higher Cost Rating of 9.0/10 compared to IONOS Cloud with 8.0/10. Both providers receive a price score of 8/10, which is above average (Ø 6.4/10). However, actual costs are highly workload-dependent; IONOS offers, for example, cheap egress (10.0/10), while Infomaniak has different pricing structures for CPU (6.5/10) and RAM (7.5/10).
Neither provider is strong in these areas. Both receive scores of 3/10 for AI and Big Data, which is significantly below average (Ø 4.8/10). IONOS offers an AI Model Hub and Managed Stackable Data Platform, while Infomaniak has limited AI services. For demanding AI/Big Data use cases, both providers are only conditionally suitable.
Yes, Infomaniak offers a comprehensive collaboration portfolio with kSuite (kDrive, kMail, kMeet, kChat) and a score of 8/10. IONOS Cloud has a score of 1/10 here and offers no workplace services. For organizations that want to integrate infrastructure and office tools, Infomaniak is the clear choice.
The Cloud Compass determines the best cloud for your use case — data-driven and vendor-neutral.
Start Cloud Compass