Direct comparison
IONOS Cloud vs T Cloud Public
IONOS Cloud or T Cloud Public? The direct cloud comparison of services, data centers, costs and sovereignty. Services, pricing, data centers and sovereignty in a direct comparison.
Management summary
As of 2026-07IONOS Cloud and T Cloud Public position themselves as sovereign EU cloud providers with maximum operational sovereignty (10/10) and strong technological independence (9/10 each). IONOS Cloud impresses with an above-average price-performance ratio (8/10) and a mature Bare Metal and container offering, making it attractive for cost-sensitive, Europe-focused infrastructure scenarios. T Cloud Public offers a broader portfolio with over 80 services, particularly in the area of Managed Databases and Serverless, and scores with high savings potential through Saving Plans (48%), but remains less competitive on base costs for CPU and Egress. While IONOS Cloud offers clearer advantages for classic infrastructure and container workloads due to its Bare Metal strength (8/10) and container maturity (8/10), T Cloud Public provides deeper database and storage variety, but suffers from very limited global reach (2/10) and weaker AI/Big Data capabilities (2/10 each).
Methodology & data basisIONOS Cloud
EU providerUSP: German cloud with independent radio of CPU and RAM in public Cloud, Broad offering of shared and dedicated instances.
Recommendation: Recommended for cost-conscious companies that focus on the EU market and require a mix of shared and dedicated hardware.
T Cloud Public
EU providerUSP: German cloud provider with an independent, broad public cloud portfolio combining shared and dedicated resources, including first serverless capabilities.
Recommendation: Recommended for companies in DACH and the Netherlands that operate regionally but require high availability and strong data sovereignty.
Performance chart
IONOS Cloud and T Cloud Public across 8 core categories, compared with the average of all providers (1–10).
Market positioning
All 13 providers by sovereignty and portfolio performance — purely computed from the category ratings.
Positions are purely computational: X = mean of technological & operational sovereignty, Y = mean of all remaining rating categories (each 1–10). Not a ranking recommendation. Methodology & data basis
Strengths & weaknesses
Automatically derived from the editorially reviewed rating data and backed by the category ratings (1–10) — fair to both sides.
Strengths
- Highest operational sovereignty (10/10) combined with strong technological sovereignty (9/10), ensuring full control from Europe and low lock-in.
- Above-average price competitiveness (8/10) with a Cost Rating of 8.0/10, particularly for CPU, RAM, and Egress costs.
- Mature Bare Metal offering (8/10) with a wide range of dedicated physical servers for specific performance requirements.
- Growing container platform (8/10) with Managed Kubernetes, which is above the industry average (7.3/10).
Points to consider
- Limited AI and Big Data capabilities (3/10 each), which are significantly below the industry average (4.8/10 each) and complicate complex analytics scenarios.
- Average high availability (5/10) compared to the industry average (6.7/10), which limits disaster recovery options.
- No collaboration tools (1/10), meaning integrated workplace solutions are not offered.
Strengths
- Maximum operational sovereignty (10/10) and high technological sovereignty (9/10) through an open stack and EU-based operations.
- Broad service portfolio with over 80 services, going beyond pure IaaS and offering extensive Managed Database options.
- High savings potential through Saving Plans with up to 48% discount, which can optimize TCO for certain workloads.
- Strong data security (7/10) with comprehensive certifications such as C5, ISO 27001, and BSI-Kritis compliance.
Points to consider
- Very weak AI and Big Data capabilities (2/10 each), which are far below the industry average (4.8/10 each).
- Low global reach (2/10) with presence in only 3 countries, which severely restricts the international customer base.
- Weak Bare Metal and virtualization options (1/10 each), which complicates classic enterprise migrations and dedicated hardware requirements.
Which provider when?
Use-case-based decision aid — both options are a valid choice.
Choose IONOS Cloud if:
- You prioritize cost efficiency for IaaS workloads, particularly for CPU, RAM, and traffic (Egress).
- You require mature Bare Metal hosting or a strong Managed Kubernetes platform for container workloads.
- You are looking for a provider with high operational sovereignty and a focus on the European market without global expansion.
- You prefer a provider with a strong price-performance ratio (Cost Rating 8.0/10) and transparent pricing.
Choose T Cloud Public if:
- You require a broad portfolio of Managed Databases and storage options with over 80 services.
- You plan to use Saving Plans with up to 48% savings for long-term commitments.
- You operate primarily in DACH and the Netherlands and require maximum operational sovereignty (10/10).
- You require Serverless capabilities (Function Graph) and a wide selection of database engines.
Service comparison by category
All 19 rating categories in a head-to-head duel (1–10). A notable lead is marked from a 2-point difference.
| Category | IONOS CloudvsT Cloud PublicScale 1–10 | Avg. all | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Security & Encryption | 77 | 7.8 | balanced |
| Technological Sovereignty | 99 | 7.4 | balanced |
| Operational Sovereignty | 1010 | 8 | balanced |
| Strategic Capabilities | 65 | 6.2 | balanced |
| Price | 85 | 6.4 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Collaboration Tools | 76 | 5.1 | balanced |
| Global Reach | 42 | 4.5 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Big Data | 32 | 4.8 | balanced |
| AI | 32 | 4.8 | balanced |
| Bare Metal | 81 | 5.2 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Virtualization | 61 | 5.7 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
| Containerization | 87 | 7.3 | balanced |
| Databases | 76 | 6.9 | balanced |
| High Availability | 55 | 6.7 | balanced |
| Microsoft | 44 | 4.5 | balanced |
| Linux | 87 | 8.8 | balanced |
| Encryption | 77 | 6.8 | balanced |
| Storage | 87 | 7.7 | balanced |
| Network | 75 | 7.8 | Lead IONOS Cloud |
Management Summary
Sovereign Cloud
SEAL Framework
Strategic (15 %)
Legal & Jurisdictional (10 %)
Data & AI (10 %)
Operational (15 %)
Supply Chain (20 %)
Technology (15 %)
Security & Compliance (10 %)
Environmental (5 %)
Availability & Locations
Compute
shared & low-budget
Hot Storage
Cold Storage
Managed Databases
Network & Security
Orchestration
Virtualization
Management
Big Data
AI & Machine Learning
Compliance & Certificates
German cloud security catalogue
IT service management system standard
Information security management system
Cloud security controls for providers
Personal data protection for cloud
Privacy information management extension
Energy management for data centers
Service organization control audit reports
Payment card data security standard
Quality management system standard
Cost Indication
vCPU/h
H100/h
GB/h
CPU/h
Ratio1/4
GB/h | 3000 IOPS
GB/h
GB/h
GB/h
Cluster/h
per 1 Mil Requests
GB-Sec
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
LLama3.3-70B per 1Mil tokens
per GB
Our comparison methodology
The scores show a relative price comparison per service category. The lowest price earns 10 points; higher prices are marked down proportionally. Missing services are treated neutrally.
As of: List prices as of 11 September 2025, location Germany (DE).
More cloud comparisons
Frequently asked questions: IONOS Cloud vs T Cloud Public
What is the difference between IONOS Cloud and T Cloud Public?
IONOS Cloud is characterized by an above-average price-performance ratio (8/10) and a strong Bare Metal and container offering (8/10 each). T Cloud Public offers a broader service portfolio (80+ services) with a focus on Managed Databases and Serverless, but has a lower overall price rating (5/10) and weaker Bare Metal options (1/10).
Which provider is more sovereign?
Both providers achieve the maximum score for operational sovereignty (10/10) and high technological sovereignty (9/10). IONOS Cloud has a slightly higher SEAL Score of 8.0/10 (80%) compared to T Cloud Public with 7.6/10 (76%), indicating a marginal strength for IONOS in the overall assessment of sovereignty criteria.
Which provider is cheaper?
IONOS Cloud has a significantly better Cost Rating of 8.0/10 compared to T Cloud Public with 5.8/10. This is reflected particularly in the prices for CPU, RAM, and Egress. However, T Cloud Public offers Saving Plans with up to 48% savings, which can reduce costs for certain workloads. Actual costs are, however, highly workload-dependent.
Which provider is better for AI and Big Data?
Both providers score poorly in these categories. IONOS Cloud achieves 3/10 for AI and Big Data, while T Cloud Public scores only 2/10 in both categories. Both are significantly below the industry average of 4.8/10. For demanding AI or Big Data scenarios, specialized providers or hybrid solutions are recommended.
Which provider has better global reach?
IONOS Cloud has better global reach with a score of 4/10 and presence in 4 countries, including the USA. T Cloud Public has very limited reach with a score of 2/10 and is present in only 3 European countries. For international customers, IONOS Cloud is therefore the more suitable choice.
Not sure which provider fits you?
The Cloud Compass determines the best cloud for your use case — data-driven and vendor-neutral.
Start Cloud Compass